Kant vs Bentham Essay

Throughout the res publica of philosophy at that place hurl been rough(prenominal) arguments on the desire of ethics and what motivates tender genius and guides our judgments. I depart be foc utilize on two philosophers both of whom tried to answer that question. Jeremy Bentham whose views on what should be theatrical roled to guide our judgments as to whats misuse or right take for been defined as utilitarianism. Focusing on a unalike idea using morality and a sense of c entire deception to the great solid comes, Immanuel Kants ethics of deontology, or the ethics of rules and duties.Jeremy Benthams ideas of utilitarianism counselling on the experiences of enjoyment over cark. To Bentham return is the property in any endeavor that tends to produce benefit, good, pleasure or pleasure or pr sluicet the happening of pain/evil, or unhappiness to the party where touch on is considered. Kant on the other hand uses what he called imperatives to answer what should b e considered morally right. The imperative, the law or choice must be respected, no matter what consequences come from the choice. besides Kant looks at it this way, if the action in and of itself could be placed into a law for the morals of the wad. Bentham So Immanuel, be you conjectureing that in order for a person to be moral that he has to possess his or her own free will? Kant Yes Jeremy that is correct, your idea that morality can be fit(p) by a government or a majority of the people is ridiculous. Bentham Youre premature on that account Immanuel because benignant kind is evil in nature so they ache a baffling time deciding what is right and wrong so we need rules to govern us to control the right findings.Kant Even though those rights may infringe on our individual(prenominal) beliefs? Our individuality is what makes us tender-hearted, whole Bentham You ar wrong about that, the greater good is what is important, so what if a minority of the people is left out, it is important that the majority is happy, and then and only then will it matter. Kant No, as a human, we can govern ourselves. We have the knowledge within us to make the right or wrong choices we do non need a bureaucrat sitting behind a desk somewhere to make that choice for us.Bentham Your idea of the use of morality sickens me Immanuel. You sit here on your high horse saying that if you decide that, oh let us just say killing is wrong, and someone breaks into your home and starts to fuck up or murder your wife or child then you atomic number 18 thoton to stand back and do nix Kant If I have made that decision that killing is wrong then yes, I will have to stand by that choice. Bentham You know Kant, I think you would pretermit that choice and you would defend your household because it is for the greater good of your family.Kant Well we will have to cross that bridge when we get there want we. So Benth old pal, you split everyone that pure ethics be non practical, t hat you have to arrange things so it will compatible with human nature, why is that? Bentham Because my friend, domain be in general equivalent animals. We are instinctive and act on emotions we need to have rules and regulations to make unnecessary us on the straight and narrow. Just perspicacious that there are consequences to our actions nurture us in line, wouldnt you say?Kant No, I think people have a working knowledge of what is right and what is wrong we do not need rules to keep us in line, which again, we can do those ourselves, unless, of course, a person is criminally harebrained and they cant distinguish mingled with the two actions. Kant So then if your wheels are stuck in mud on this and keep spinning, how then do you see human being in general? Bentham Humans, by nature, are as follows. We are selfish and greedy, pleasure seeking, out for themselves, and in general not very trustworthy.Kant So you put me and you in those categories Jeremy? Bentham Well we are human are we not Immanuel? Kant You are impossible Jeremy I am done having this conversation with you Immanuel it is same talking to brick wall. Bentham You know you enjoyed it Mr. Kant, and I spiel we will talk again true soon. Morality and ethics are different for all of us, and I desire that Kant makes some good points, and Bentham has some good points but there are flaws in both. We all face choices in our lives sometimes they are dictated by the situation or opportunity.If a gunman walked into a displace store, would I take the gunman buck to save lives putting my life in jeopardy, would I tell him the police are on their way even though I may be lying? Kant follows a strict path, one that he may have broken if face up with a certain situation, we are human of course, and this is where I side with Bentham. Being a former law officer I have seen good and bad in this world and I do believe that we do need rules to govern us, even though we might not reserve with the all.